Zero coverage because they don't want you to have the info

[Dill]

(05-23-2022, 07:54 AM)SunsetBengal Wrote: The key info from the article.

Quote:Clinton was not supposed to be the object of the Sussmann trial, because Judge Christopher Cooper, an Obama appointee, issued a series of orders limiting the scope of the trial and its evidence. The orders were viewed as “spar[ing] the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee … potential embarrassment.” 

Until I know BY WHOM orders limiting the scope of the investigation were viewed as sparing the Clinton campaign, I'd stop short of calling this "information," let alone "key." That the judge was an Obama appointee doesn't really help readers who don't think mention of appointment is enough to explain legal behavior.  It MAY matter that a judge is "a Mexican," but the mere mention should not stand as explanation.

Same goes for references to the Steele Dossier as "the basis of the Russia collusion investigation."

And the claim that bringing an actual investigation into communication between a Trump.org server and a Russian Bank was "successful disinformation."