06-17-2022, 12:38 PM
(06-17-2022, 12:29 PM)reuben.ahmed Wrote: Weapons that can cause mass destruction. What you determine is mass destruction is probably different than someone else, but in the future if you could own your own mini nuclear weapon - what's stopping you?
The constitution is old, there are amendments, imagine in 5000 years people are still arguing on whether or not they are allowed to press a button that could blow up the planet because the constitution says so.
The intent as I gather as to be able to form a militia. Both "sides" believe in this, but it appears one "side" does not want to regulate it. Regardless of both sides, you won't be to beat an army who owns guns and weapons of mass destruction.
This is why people "hate" LeBron and Burrow shares the same views, they don't want to destroy the "Godly" image of Joe Burrow by him speaking his mind, but that's what Burrow does best.
The SC has ruled it is an individual right, not only for militia. That is settled law. As for not being able to beat an army with guns and wmd's, tell that to the Taliban
