06-30-2022, 04:14 PM
(06-30-2022, 12:35 PM)Lucidus Wrote: The fact that the Committee had already spoken to all 3 individuals prior to Ms. Hutchinson's testimony would seem to suggest they found her accounts / version of events credible based on what they heard in those closed door meetings or by other evidence that we don't yet know about.
I simply don't think they would put her in the spotlight, under oath, if they hadn't found her to be convincing and tenable.
You would certainly think so. However, it being so directly, and immediately refuted by people who were actually there doesn't lend itself readily to that conclusion.