06-30-2022, 07:28 PM
(06-30-2022, 06:10 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: This is not a difficult concept. If she's falsifying testimony or even repeating inaccurate information it throws the validity of everything she testifies to into question. You're clearly a person who wants to get to the truth of what happened, you should be as upset about this as anyone.
Uhh, they're Secret Service agents, they joined to protect the POTUS, which btw is a high tier position in the agency. Notice I said the POTUS, not Trump. Unless you have some evidence they are compromised by some undying loyalty to Trump the default position is that they are not Trump loyalists. Or are you asking for me to prove they are not? Because that would be silly.
Wow, you're delusional. Why quote everything when you're going to ignore most of it? What are you afraid of?
Did she convince the DC police to lie about "an elevated threat in the trees" about a guy in the trees with a gun?
Did she convince the DC police to lie and alert people about three guys walking down the street with AR-15s?
And you skipped these
Plenty of people are backing up her credibility . . . anybody backing up Ornato?
When are you going to comment on Trump knowing there were armed people in the crowd and still went on stage? I haven't seen that yet. Lots of deflection with penny ante bullshit, though.
Before Trump, has a President ever been told "Mr President, there are people here that are armed and will not surrender their weapons" and he still went on stage?
No comment on how Trump knew the crowd was armed and sent them down to the Capitol?
Divert away.
Only users lose drugs.
:-)-~~~
:-)-~~~