07-04-2022, 06:03 PM
(07-04-2022, 05:54 PM)Lucidus Wrote: My entire point is that it violates a person's autonomy, for all the reasons I mentioned. I don't consider right to bodily autonomy or freedom over medical decisions to be at all nonsensical.
If Dobbs had been about giving the states the power to ban vasectomies instead of abortions, those directly affected would be furious because they know the government shouldn't have the right to forcibly impose their morality onto the sperm ducts of it's citizens.
Your comparison, as if they were similar and your subsequent attempts to argue their similarity was non-sensical. And btw if you were ok with Roe then you were ok with lack of autonomy.
“History teaches that grave threats to liberty often come in times of urgency, when constitutional rights seem too extravagant to endure.”-Thurgood Marshall
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
