07-13-2022, 04:32 PM
(07-13-2022, 04:07 PM)GMDino Wrote: Except the "perfectly valid, and accurate, criticism of your stated positions" was not only wrong, it came from a guy who actually had his facts wrong and wouldn't admit it because of didn't "fit his narrative". And from someone who cast doubt on THIS story because it didn't "fit his narrative".
So, not only the exact same thing but the exact opposite thing.
As per usual, you went barking up the wrong tree 'cause you saw a squirrel there one time.
Exactly how does this change you doing the same thing you're accusing him of? Even if your accusation is 100% accurate it does not absolve you of the same sin. I think it's very reasonable to request some actual proof of a national news story being used by federal politicians to advance their agenda. Whether he failed to require the same proof for other stories in the past is immaterial to this, or the accusation of your engaging in the exact same behavior.
