Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Early winners and losers at Training camp
(08-08-2022, 06:44 PM)fredtoast Wrote: You guys just don't get it.  Right now all we have are opinions.  And I am taking the opinion of professional talent evaluators from the NFL over you guys.

Sure, every team misses from time to time, but in a majority of cases the better player gets paid better.  Your argument is like using Tom Brady to prove that you are more likely to get a great QB in the sixth round than in the first.

And let me repeat that I feel we got a much better bargain in Hurst.  I just don't see him as a big improvement over Uzomah.

I see Hurtz as an upgrade over Uzomah in terms of on the field productivity. That said, you can't compare what teams are willing to pay players as proof that the "NFL" or "professional talent evaluators" as proof of one player being better than the other. Bad teams almost always HAVE to overpay players to get them to sign with them. That doesn't make said player better. Not to mention if players decide to take a pay cut to play for a variety of reasons.

According to your logic, "professional talent evaluators" think Tom Brady is the 16th best QB in the league behind such greats like Kirk Cousins, Jared Goff, Carson Wentz and Jimmy Garoppolo, to name a few. 
[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Early winners and losers at Training camp - PhilHos - 08-09-2022, 12:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)