JoeyB and the Magic Bean

[jfkbengals]

(09-11-2022, 12:08 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Our? Who is saying that they shouldn't consider if a QB has a winning record or not? Why would we argue that winning games is not important? Anderson won games. 

Because winning games is a function of the team, not the QB alone.  Archie Manning did not win games.  It had nothing to do with him being a great QB.  It was because the Saints were a bad franchise.  Same with Stafford during the Detroit years.

And don't get me wrong, I LOVED Anderson as a QB.  I've got an autographed photo and jersey on the wall.  And I 100% think he should be in the Hall.  But if win percentage is an important stat for getting in, then Anderson is screwed if he doesn't get in before Nick Foles, Jared Goff, and Ryan Tannehill retire.  They all have better win percentages than Anderson's 52%.  And for the record, none of those guys are worthy of HOF consideration.