Blocked XP

[*rfaulk34*]

(09-11-2022, 09:00 PM)Nicomo Cosca Wrote: The way I understand it, the ball has to break the plane. It was super close, and i would have personally challenged it, but I’m not sure it would have been overturned.

It goes back to germaine gresham vs the Ravens. In order for the ball breaking the plane of the ez to work, both feet have to be down in the field of play and the receiver has to be considered a runner. That was more with the old rule of "completing the catch through the ground" though. 

If he's straddling, has one foot down inbounds in the ez and one in the field of play, it's a catch and where the ball is in that moment is what is relevant. 

He had one foot in the ez (if i recall corretly, i'm kind of going off memory now) and one in the fop. the ball was crossing the ez when he had control so it should have been a td.