Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Alito and the 1st amendment
#37
(10-29-2022, 03:29 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: It is worth noting that you're a Steelers fan and thus aren't eligible to post in the far-and-away most popular part of this site, yet I think you've still got the most posts of any member on a Bengals message board. So there might be a grain of truth to that.

Oddly enough, considering the topic of this thread, the member with the most posts is the now banned/censored Fredtoast. He posted something the board owners and administrators felt violated the terms of agreement he accepted when he signed up and thus they removed him. Just like Twitter removes members who continually violated their terms of service. Their playground…their rules.
The government cannot make laws abridging free speech but private business sure can. And that is the part that gets left out of this discussion. Twitter and other social media platforms get to set the rules of engagement. They can be as loose or as tight as they choose. Only their stockholders and advertisers have any real power to change that
 

 Fueled by the pursuit of greatness.
 




Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Alito and the 1st amendment - GMDino - 10-27-2022, 09:42 PM
RE: Alito and the 1st amendment - GMDino - 10-28-2022, 09:25 AM
RE: Alito and the 1st amendment - Dill - 10-28-2022, 10:51 AM
RE: Alito and the 1st amendment - GMDino - 10-28-2022, 12:42 PM
RE: Alito and the 1st amendment - Dill - 10-28-2022, 01:47 PM
RE: Alito and the 1st amendment - GMDino - 10-28-2022, 12:40 PM
RE: Alito and the 1st amendment - pally - 10-31-2022, 04:49 AM
RE: Alito and the 1st amendment - GMDino - 10-28-2022, 01:52 PM
RE: Alito and the 1st amendment - CJD - 10-28-2022, 02:21 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)