10-31-2022, 12:40 PM
For those who advocate for waiting for the whole story, I say bravo. I don't have any more information than you do on this case (which is odd by itself), but there are definitely some odd things that raise questions. I will list some of them, along with possible explanations.
1. Who was the third guy who opened the door for police? This one is especially odd as the media is now walking this bit back. It is certainly possible that this was just wrong information that has since been removed from the story. But that would be a rather significant thing to get wrong.
2. Why were Pelosi and his attacker in their underwear? Pelosi being in his underwear could obviously be that he was sleeping and was awoken by the intruder. The attacker being in his underwear could be the result of mental illness, drug use, or both. It is very common for people on PCP to get naked, as the drug makes them feel intensely overheated. That's why one of the street terms for it is "butt naked".
3. Why did the attacker let Pelosi go into the bathroom, allowing him to call 911? This one is the most odd, but is explainable by the attacker being mentally ill, high or both. That being said, it is absolutely the most incongruent part of the story.
4. Why did Pelosi refer to the attacker as "a friend" in the 911 call, while simultaneously stating he didn't know who the attacker was? This one is also very odd, but could be explained away by Pelosi fearing that the attacker might be eavesdropping and calling him "a friend" may mollify the attacker. But, again, this one is also very odd.
The rest are things I've only heard from unverified sources, such as Pelosi not allowing access to their home security cam footage. Or that both Pelosi and the attacker had hammers. That being the case I didn't bother addressing them above. At the end of the day this is an Strange case and there are a lot of unknowns or contradictory information. Could this attack be the result of rhetoric from the GOP, possibly. Just as the Kavanaugh would be assassin could have absolutely been motivated by Dem statements on the SCOTUS being "illegitimate" and a "threat to our democracy". Best to wait for all the facts to be in the open before making the claim though, especially this close to the election.
1. Who was the third guy who opened the door for police? This one is especially odd as the media is now walking this bit back. It is certainly possible that this was just wrong information that has since been removed from the story. But that would be a rather significant thing to get wrong.
2. Why were Pelosi and his attacker in their underwear? Pelosi being in his underwear could obviously be that he was sleeping and was awoken by the intruder. The attacker being in his underwear could be the result of mental illness, drug use, or both. It is very common for people on PCP to get naked, as the drug makes them feel intensely overheated. That's why one of the street terms for it is "butt naked".
3. Why did the attacker let Pelosi go into the bathroom, allowing him to call 911? This one is the most odd, but is explainable by the attacker being mentally ill, high or both. That being said, it is absolutely the most incongruent part of the story.
4. Why did Pelosi refer to the attacker as "a friend" in the 911 call, while simultaneously stating he didn't know who the attacker was? This one is also very odd, but could be explained away by Pelosi fearing that the attacker might be eavesdropping and calling him "a friend" may mollify the attacker. But, again, this one is also very odd.
The rest are things I've only heard from unverified sources, such as Pelosi not allowing access to their home security cam footage. Or that both Pelosi and the attacker had hammers. That being the case I didn't bother addressing them above. At the end of the day this is an Strange case and there are a lot of unknowns or contradictory information. Could this attack be the result of rhetoric from the GOP, possibly. Just as the Kavanaugh would be assassin could have absolutely been motivated by Dem statements on the SCOTUS being "illegitimate" and a "threat to our democracy". Best to wait for all the facts to be in the open before making the claim though, especially this close to the election.
