02-18-2023, 04:58 PM
(02-18-2023, 03:31 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Why's he bringing it up now?
He obviously wasn't talking about that because the shooter didn't have one, meaning that he's using a tragedy to push an agenda, making him a classless piece of shit.
The shooter didn't have a pistol with an extended magazine, meaning I am not clueless or classless, am I?
Also, see the response above this one.
How would that make me classless anyways?
why not bring it up now? High-capacity magazines have been used time and time again in these mass shootings. Just because one wasn't used in this particular situation doesn't mean banning them isn't a valid argument. There is NO civilian that needs that sort of firepower. Besides the constitution only protects the right to bear arms. It doesn't protect the right to ammunition
Fueled by the pursuit of greatness.
