Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Franchise tag opens: Bengals?
#30
(02-21-2023, 02:23 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: What he's saying is that both Vonn Bell and Jesse Bates are no longer under contract, thus not on the team.

OK…..not the way I understood it. I saw it stated that Dax and Bates didn’t play together last season. They did. Bengals drafted Dax a year before they needed him, which is always a good thing.

Lots of players throughout the NFL who don’t have a contract, but are tied to a specific team (i.e. could be franchised as just one example).

I see the Bengals resigning Bell partnered with Hill as our starters. Bates money is off the books.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Franchise tag opens: Bengals? - Graphicguy - 02-22-2023, 11:40 AM
RE: Franchise tag opens: Bengals? - Nepa - 02-22-2023, 12:34 PM
RE: Franchise tag opens: Bengals? - Stewy - 02-21-2023, 03:40 PM
RE: Franchise tag opens: Bengals? - Stewy - 02-21-2023, 10:49 PM
RE: Franchise tag opens: Bengals? - pally - 02-22-2023, 12:10 PM
RE: Franchise tag opens: Bengals? - CJD - 02-21-2023, 01:32 PM
RE: Franchise tag opens: Bengals? - Au165 - 02-21-2023, 03:59 PM
RE: Franchise tag opens: Bengals? - Sled21 - 02-21-2023, 04:38 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)