Hunter Biden Whistleblower

[Dill]

(04-24-2023, 04:46 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: We also know on the other side Hillary Clinton and her campaign paid for a Russian dossier that was used to impeach the sitting POTUS only to later find out later libs knew the dossier was a fake and spent hundreds of millions of our tax payer dollars trying to prosecute him. 

God! Just like a Niagara Falls of disinformation.

Bels and BigDaddy have covered parts of your original post. I'll just manage this one.

The Clinton campaign paid for the dossier (campaign research is legal), 

but it was NOT used to impeach Trump. This is false, like your claim the Steele Dossier initiated the Russia investigation.

Trump's first impeachment was instigated by his withholding aid to Ukraine to get their leader to announce an investigation into Biden--not even investigate, just announce. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49831516  I.e., Trump was "weaponizing" his office illegally for personal political gain.

Trump should have been impeached and removed from office, but the party of personal responsibility let him off the hook, and in consequence Trump became even more reckless, working up a coup based on the lie that Biden stole the election. 

Further, the dossier is not a "fake." It was raw, unprocessed intel, some of which aligned with news of Russian interference ALREADY in the public domain--not "false" (Russian gov. payments to Flynn; contacts with Carter Page). The real charge against it is that it was vague and diffuse, a rather lazy compilation of memoranda. The impropriety involved was the DNC reported money paid for it under "legal services," for which they were fined. 

If the MAGA faithful did not like CNN et al. buzzing about the dossier and Russian connections, then they should have blamed Trump for encouraging behind the scenes contact with Russians--not the messenger. Why do you think that was ok? Not worthy of reporting or of an FBI investigation???