05-14-2023, 06:58 PM
(05-14-2023, 06:12 PM)pally Wrote: Nope, no inconsistancy here. EVERY witness Comer apparently has is in legal trouble. Cohen was not the only person to testify in front of the NY Grand jury that indicted Trump.
I may be wrong, but the only witness to any real malfeasance is Cohen. I don't think you're correct in this regard.
Quote:Unlike these "whistleblowers," Cohen went in front of a televised under-oath Congressional hearing. He went in front of a Grand Jury and testified under oath and will testify under oath at the trial. The paper trail apparently backs up his story. At least enough they feel comfortable putting him in front of a jury. His testimony has stood up under cross-examination.
I could, and will, counter that, unlike these other witnesses, Cohen is a convicted perjurer. His word means less than nothing as he is a convicted liar.
Quote:These people are anonymous. Their stories are not backed up by the paper trail the Congressmen have put out. In fact, the same James Cpmer has admitted THEY HAVE NO PROOF of any wrongdoing by Biden. Yet, Comer and the Republicans keep hyping their evidence of massive wrongdoing. Until these witnesses are placed under oath in public as far as most are concerned they don't actually exist.
In this regard you are correct, these people are currently anonymous. I am in the same boat as you as to the importance of their testimony. Where we differ is in lending any credence, at all, to a convicted perjurer. I can tell you first hand that a competent prosecutor will never, ever, rest the crux of their case on the testimony of a convicted perjurer.
