John Durham Investigation Ends

[Dill]

(05-17-2023, 06:54 AM)StrictlyBiz Wrote: It is really simple, write about what is in the report without injecting your opinion. There's no need to overthink it. 
I am not going down your rabbit-hole of endless and tiresome word salad posts of over analyzations that wear you out and grind the convesation to a halt. 

Writing "what is in the report without interjecting your opinion" is exactly what politicians want reporters to do:

                                                                                 Take dictation.

They don't want ANYONE to "overthink it," especially reporters tasked with keeping them honest; in this case, reporters who remember what
was in the 2019 IG report, and who remember why Durham was assigned his investigation in the first place.

You're the guy who introduced the issue of "media literacy" into this thread on the back of your spurious distinction between"facts" and "opinions" introduced after the fact, which masks your selection of what and what not to "overthink."   

The last time we clashed was over your reliance on Youtube videos to help you understand Barr's interception of the Mueller Report.
So yes, you don't want to go down the "rabbit hole" of reconstructing time lines and analytic distinctions between primary and secondary
sources. Hard to follow. "Russia hoax Russia hoax" is easier. Accept the Report without "overthinking," but not the reporting.