06-04-2023, 06:45 PM
(06-04-2023, 06:16 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I wish you were better at this, it would make these exchanges a bit more bearable.
Pot, meet kettle.
Quote:Ahh, you finally make a good point. Yes, a comparison could definitely be made to circumcision. Although you hear conflicting medical opinions on its benefits, or lack thereof, an argument could be made that it is in the same vein, an irreversible medical procedure. Is it on par with a double mastectomy or the inversion of a penis? I would say they're not even close, much as male circumcision is not nearly as severe a procedure as female circumcision.
So you're only anti-trans because...reasons. Got it.
Quote:I think it's going to be inevitable. I would be in favor of it in regard to eliminating genetic diseases and defects, but against it in terms of making designer babies.
Yet at the end of the day, it's not really your business what people do to their child is it? People are entitled to get what they want and as long as they get it without harming anyone else (and no, a fetus is not a person), it shouldn't matter to anyone but the mother. She's the one putting in the work.
Quote:I'm not upset by them, nor have I given any indication that I am. Kindly keep baseless accusations out of the conversation. But no, biological males are not transsexual by definition. Just because certain tissues form into different shapes (clitoris and penis for example) does not make men transsexual. Feel free to expound on this point though.
Right not transsexual; that's why males have nipples. Every fetus begins as a female - that's simple scientific fact. You have a penis, you trsns.
