Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Eifert NOT ruled out (yet), Green healing
#23
(12-23-2015, 08:43 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Oh, me too. I wanted to keep Gresh for depth; like he's being used in Arz. However, I don't think we can ignore the fact that Eifert has been less than an ironman to date in his career. Hopefully Kroft is the real deal. 
I'll probably get slammed for this but Gresh might be missed in the run blocking department.

Remember how much people bitched because he wasn't being used downfield.

Well guess what.  Eifert is being used in the seams and downfield.  TDs way up for our starting TE. 

Run blocking way down. Hewitt and Kroft sometimes questionable/sometimes serviceable play.

Maybe this isn't so much a statement about Gresham, but more so about the trade off for sending the TE out on routes as opposed to keeping him near LOS.

TDs and a reliable outlet option for the QB seems like an acceptable trade off for a mediocre run game. 

The key word is reliable(minus that awful Texans game).  Which I'm sure we can all appreciate when he's playing.
[Image: 51209558878_91a895e0bb_m.jpg]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Eifert NOT ruled out (yet), Green healing - BengalsRocker - 12-24-2015, 09:00 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)