Is it OK for biological males to compete against women?

[GMDino]

(06-22-2023, 12:28 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Young ladies do develop athletically faster than boys. I coached a very good select soccer team. I used to scrimmage select boys teams once a year when they were 10 years old. We beat them by 2 goals a game on average. 11 year old scrimmages we tied or won by a goal. At age 12, the boys dominated us and easy to see the boys athletic ability. Their speed, power and endurance overwhelmed my team that was one of the best teams in the US.

Serena and Venus Williams each lost in back to back tennis matches to a male tennis pro ranked around #200 in the world. Serena is one of the best women's tennis player in history, yet a male beat her and did i easily.

Why do pro women's tennis matches have best of 3 sets, yet men have best of 5 sets? Simple, men are physically superior over women.

I see some interesting takes. One is it is not a large issue impacting a lot of women YET. I agree and that is why I wonder why Democrats would go out on a limb on a topic Moms and Dads are against their daughter competing against males.

They were 16 when he beat them.  He was 31.

They got much better.  He did not...lol.

Women play three sets because "it was always done that way"  And there has been debate on whether men should go to three sets too. Some of the best male players are for it while some oppose it for "traditional" reasons.

I wonder why the gop is making a huge issue and passing laws to affect a handful of people in the country.  Probably because they don't have any real policies so they need to rile up people to get angry or afraid of anyone different than them.