Whistleblower(s) from IRS sworn testimony on Biden Investigation

[Dill]

(06-29-2023, 04:29 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: It is strange you use two known business people to denounce the innocence of Hunter Biden. Help us out, what business in China, Ukraine and Romania is HB in exactly? If Ivanka underreported her income in foreign countries by over 8 million dollars, she too should go to jail. But, I guess I missed where she committed a crime.

HB admitted he committed crimes. The question becomes is will he be treated fairly, the same way others were treated for their crimes?

Don't know what you mean by "denouncing" Hunter Biden's "innocence." I've neither announced or denounced it.

My post was about how Hunter's investigation is only a faux political storm to create a counter narrative about Joe Biden. That's just to help Trump by diverting attention from his many investigations and bad public behavior--and to create more false equivalence, like "both sides" have equally corrupt leaders under investigation. 

The allusion in the bolded was to concrete evidence of Trump's use of his office to bend U.S. foreign policy (which represents the nation) to personal gain. THAT'S what's needed to impeach or otherwise damage Joe. But so far no such evidence has been forthcoming. 

The Senate had the goods on Trump, but like a good regime party beholden to its leader and not the people who elected them, the GOP decided NOT to hold him to the same standards as it would any other gov. official vested with the highest responsibility and expectation of ethical behavior--because he was in office. If they sincerely held that standard, would they be trying so hard now to prove that Joe has sunk as low as Trump? How could they do anything about "corruption" if presidents in office can't be prosecuted? 

Seven Benghazi investigations finally revealed that Hilary had an authorized server. That allowed Trump to be elected. If it were really about Benghazi, they'd have stopped at one, since all material questions were settled there. But McCarthy publicly gauged the success of those investigations on how they harmed Hilary. 

Same here. If Hunter is punished for fraud and nothing rubs off on Joe--if Joe isn't using Chinese money for membership in a sex club--then for the RWM and GOP Congress the project is a failure.  Another investigation will be needed. Five more if necessary, and more "whistleblowers." 

Hunter has already been treated the same way others are--except he has a GOP Congress and RWM on him as well. That's unlikely to happen to us, even if we underreport 100 million in income over 10 years.

Unlike Hunter, the "known business people" you refer to were part of our government, and could parley that power into considerable financial gain. 

But you miss the "crime" here, because only an ethical norm was violated on the face of things, and there has been no fanatical politically motivated drive to investigate these two. MSM doesn't flow from one cycle of "breaking news" hysteria to another. These two were less qualified to be presidential advisors than Hunter was to sit on the board of a for profit corporation, but "No crime" so ok? 

Shades of Whitewater. No way an "investigation," and then another, couldn't find one eventually? SOMETHING at least?