We are all equal again, right?

[Dill]

(07-09-2023, 02:58 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Did he possibly get in because of AA, sure.  Did he definitely get in because of AA as he did/does, you, and many other leftists believe?  No, that cannot be proven.  You said he benefited, this cannot be stated definitively.  Again, it is interesting that your assumption of this only proves his point, and his issue with AA, for him.  I guess according to condescending leftists there's no way a qualified black man could get in without AA.  Just like Asians can't agree with the "white majority" without having been manipulated by it.  What a low opinion of ethnic minorities many leftists possess.

Like I said, the more things change.

So were qualified black candidates getting into Yale law just fine BEFORE “condescending leftists” with “low opinions” of minorities created AA policies?

Why would people with a “low opinion” of minorities want to bring them into a top law school?

Wonder if any of the hundreds of white legacy admissions who could not otherwise have qualified for yale admission felt people judging them as Thomas did? Still a valid question since qualified minorities are still bumped for hundreds of unqualified whites every year—as minority advocates who opposed Students for Fair admissions (and the white majority) well knew.

14 black students were admitted to Yale in 1964–the largest group in its history till then. People who didn’t have a low opinion of minorities had been keeping the numbers to single digits before that?