Whistleblower(s) from IRS sworn testimony on Biden Investigation

[BengalYankee]

(07-21-2023, 04:48 PM)Dill Wrote: Yes, that's right, BY.

Testimony IS evidence, but it also has to be cross-examined, evaluated in relation to other testimony. 

A whistle blower makes a statement. "My supervisor said X." That's not stand alone slam dunk proof. 
The supervisor also gets to state his version of events, his testimony, and then both are compared to what documentary
record can be had. If there is a conflict, then the cross-examination begins to resolve the conflict, if possible.

Most every witness statement in the 1/6 hearing was met with a storm of counter-testimony, at least on various media.  
That's why often see in such cases that people go after credibility--so-and-so's wife donated to the Dems. 
And don't shy from intimidation--Here are the addresses of his children, etc. 

Mr. Dill,

You are correct in your explanation.

I was replying to Pally's ridiculous statement "What you saw was testimony you perceived to be truthful.  That is not evidence.  Evidence is something that is quantifiable or physical not spoken words."