Whistleblower(s) from IRS sworn testimony on Biden Investigation

[Dill]

(07-26-2023, 04:15 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: So you are saying Susan Rice did not go on liberal TV news shows citing it was act due to a anti muslim film?
https://www.wsj.com/articles/BL-WB-36921

In the TV interviews, Ms. Rice said the attack resulted from a popular protest against a U.S.-made video, rather than a pre-planned terrorist attack. 

Trump Collusion article
https://theintercept.com/2019/04/18/robert-mueller-did-not-merely-reject-the-trumprussia-conspiracy-theories-he-obliterated-them/

Having a US Congressman on national cable and liberal news agency spewing lies he had proof Trump colluded with Russia is insinuating Trump colluded with Russia. They never doubted Schiff's lies or asked hm to provide the proof. 

As for the Joe Biden case of bribery with Ukraine, China and others it is still under investigation. I understand you would love to believe Biden did not take a bribe to get the prosecutor fired in Ukraine as it would bigger than Watergate. But, because our justice department did not thoroughly investigate the Biden's, the house oversight and ways and means committees are doing an investigation. Stay tuned, Archer is slated to testify Monday and if reports are correct, it will be more evidence "the big guy" Joe Biden was involved in the Burisma and Chinese deals.

Your claim, that Biden fired a Ukrainian prosecutor to protect his son, is NOT "still under investigation."  It's just disinformation.

It requires NO investigation to show that 

1. The IMF, EU and Obama wanted Shokin fired. Joe, who could not fire him on his own, or with hold billions, delivered a message.
    Listen to what you are saying. No one needs to investigate whether a VP could with hold a billion in aid on his own initiative any more than     they'd need an "investigation" to find out who breaks ties in a Senate vote.

2. The prosecutor was fired because he was NOT investigating Burisma. That's already shown, done, years ago. That determination by     international oversight had NOTHING to do with Biden.

Now for the umpteenth time can you please just say "Yes Dill that's right. As VP, Biden did not have the power to get Shokin fired, and Shokin was fired because he would not prosecute Burisma." And you won't continue making that claim on other threads. Don't introduce another subject. Just do that for me and THEN I'll be happy to explain what you've got wrong about Benghazi. If can't accept this simple, plain refutation of your Biden claim, how will you respond to the same for the 7 Benghazi nothingburgers?