Whistleblower(s) from IRS sworn testimony on Biden Investigation

[Dill]

(07-27-2023, 12:08 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Sorry you are wrong. The house oversight committee has found the money, has a 1023 interview that outlines Joe Biden worked to  fired the prosecutor investigating Hunter. This committee has found more evidence in 6 months than D.O.J. and F.B.I found in 5 years most likely because they did not want to find evidence against Joe Biden. Archer will testify Monday, stay tuned for more evidence Joe Biden took a bribe from Burisma to get the prosecutor fired.

Please read the 1023 form, it will give you insight to what really happened in Ukraine. Joe bragged about it. 

Been there, done that. Suddenly, dodgy second hand sources are trustworthy. Believe everything the objects of a corruption investigation have to say to exonerate themselves.

What "money" are you talking about?  Nothing in that form confirms Biden pressured Ukraine to fire Shokin to protect his son. 

Nothing in that form can establish that Joe could, on his own, withhold a billion dollars of foreign aid to Ukraine. It does not establish that Joe had the power to do what VPs cannot do on their own.

Nothing in that form can establish that Joe was NOT acting on behalf of the IMF, EU and U.S. when demanded Shokin's firing.
It does not shift primary responsibility for the firing from the IMF, EU and U.S. to Biden. 

Nothing in that form can disprove that efforts to fire Shokin were a concerted, international effort by institutions with no interest in HB. 

Aren't you curious to hear how Benghazi was just GOP drama which produced no convictions, 
in contrast to the Russia investigation which produced dozens? 

We won't get there until you acknowledge that "Biden pressured Ukraine to fire Shokin to save Hunter" is disinformation and inverts reality.  That doesn't mean you can't keep your belief that House oversight has "found the money" or that the FBI is biased or whatever.