08-03-2023, 04:38 PM
(07-31-2023, 08:52 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Agreed. After reading through the filing there is no admission of knowingly making false statements. Giuliani states that he made statements that are false, but he does not stipulate when he knew them to be false. Could that be something that is drug out of him? Potentially. He could of course take the Fifth in such a case, though if a prosecutor were to offer him immunity for his testimony against Trump then the Fifth would no longer be on the table.Not so fast my friend! In #4 of Rudy's No Contest stipulation he concedes.
It's all such a good time.
4) Defendant Giuliani DOES NOT CONTEST the INTENTIONAL INFLICTION of harm or other related tort claims.
Black's Law Dictionary defines “knowingly” as “[w]ith knowledge; consciously; intelligently; willfully; intentionally.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720/gov.uscourts.dcd.238720.84.2.pdf