08-13-2023, 02:42 PM
(08-13-2023, 01:25 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: I'm going to go ahead and say that I would not be comfortable with either Trevor Siemian or Jack Browning having to steer the ship for more than a series or two in regular season action. Browning looks to have some steady in him to be developed, as he seemed to elevate TE Tanner Hudson when plays began to break down. Browning looks to be worth keeping around and continuing his development.
Trevor Siemian on the other hand looked really lost and flustered, especially when you consider that he's got 8 years of experience, including 30 starts. Not only did he look "lost" at times, I questioned what appeared to be a lack of effort. Many of us seemed comfortable with him as backup QB when he was signed, but now I'm not so sure that he's the guy.
Was really surprised that Browning got the start over Siemian and how bad Siemian looked.
Yes, I would be looking around after that game for a backup QB. They were so inaccurate I couldn't believe it.
Man, if I was a backup QB in the league I would be working my ass off to be as accurate as possible. I just don't understand being
that bad at your job. Hit the dude in the numbers. The one pass where Browning threw way high over Shed Jackson was inexcusable.
Give the guy a chance. You aren't throwing to a 16 foot giant, he deserved that Interception.
