Reasons Why F.B.I. and D.O.J. are corrupt

[Mike M (the other one)]

(08-20-2023, 10:56 AM)Dill Wrote: "Many of them" is not 17 k. 

And again, so far as I know you are referring to the three long email chains which had classified material buried in them--some classified retroactively. That's been known since 2015. 

And you've got nothing prosecutable even if you prove some work emails were "intentionally" deleted during a mass assessment of thousands. Best you can get from that is a minor violation of the Records Act. There was no effort on Clinton's part to hoard documents, keep them as trophies, and expose them to reporters and house guests, or to lie about having them. She clearly had no interest in keeping anything or showing what she had to anyone outside the government--the critical threshold for prosecution. Everyone agrees that her handling of the emails was "reckless." That's not always prosecutable.

And again your whole premise, that HRC is not held to the same level of responsibility, depends on ignoring the basic differences in context and intent here. We only know about the emails because of the most partisan and shrill series of Congressional investigation in history (until the current Biden investigation). That's not favoritism.

Trump had actual physical documents that he intentionally retained to keep--top secret at that, still a danger to national security. We know about them not because of some partisan BS Congressional investigation, but because the National Archives was trying to get them back for a year. Any other person would have been arrested for trying to keep them. Trump had every opportunity to return those documents and refused to, deflecting request after request. Then after a subpoena he turned some over and attempted to hide the rest. When the FBI had to search his residence to finally get them, he went public with a BS claim that the documents were his, and that as president he could de-classify documents just by thinking it--nevermind that the documents weren't his in the first place, de-classified or not. 

So back the question of how you would prosecute--Trump's case looks like a slam dunk here. He willfully retained critical top secret information and waved it in front of people without clearance, and who knows what else. He willfully defied a subpoena to retain them. Now other people are also being prosecuted for helping him hide and retain evidence, and to eliminate proof thereof. That's a conspiracy, and quite beyond "reckless." 

17k of those deleted and not turned over WERE work related, intent isn't that important, it's a violation of the subpoena period and a mishandling of © documents as well and she wasn't even a VP or POTUS. One can only imagine her handling of them since she was "so stupid" to not know better had she been a POTUS.

How do you know she didn't share them with anyone that wasn't supposed to know? You got the insider tips on that or just taking her at her word for it? If you are taking her for her word, then why won't you take the USSCJ and his Billionaire friend word for it when they said no cases were discussed on their vacations?

Doing the wash would be like Trump burning the Mars-A-Lago storage room and saying Oops, and you wouldn't believe it wasn't intentional.

Biden has documents in his home that had not been de-classified from his time as VP and while we are at it, let's go after Clinton, Bush Jr and Obama as well. Find out just how many mis-handle documents and make sure that everyone gets hammered to the wall that did.

Go on, you are intent on setting a new precedent just to nail Trump, so get 'em all cowboy!
Biden (and any future POTUS's) better watch out when they leave office. If the other party wins, they will be coming for them.

I know Trump wasn't very smart about things, but you better watch out how this is handled cause it's setting a Precedent that Can and Will be used against each POTUS going forward as well.