08-23-2023, 04:26 PM
(08-23-2023, 04:01 PM)BIGDADDYFROMCINCINNATI Wrote: This is where you are dead wrong and most likely what 'Bengalholic is talking about. Instead of parroting what you hear off AM radio and far-right podcasts, take the time to read the full 448-page Mueller report. Also, the list of criminal indictments against Trump. You'd be surprised of what you might learn. I'm not going to say you come on here and flat-out lie, but not "doing your research" and just parroting right-wing podcast talking points just shows a lack of effort.
Here are some excerpts from Mueller's interview regarding his findings.
- Through two years of this investigation, through the indictment of 34 individuals, and then spelled out clearly in his final report, Robert Mueller made one thing crystal clear: Russia attempted to interfere with our 2016 election.
Here's the last thing Mueller said on June 3, 2019:
- Robert Mueller:
"And, I will close by reiterating the central allegation of our indictments, that there were multiple, systematic efforts to interfere in our election.
And that allegation deserves the attention of every American. Thank you."- Over the course of his nearly two-year-long probe, special counsel Robert Mueller and his team of prosecutors have now indicted 34 individuals and three Russian businesses on charges ranging from computer hacking to conspiracy and financial crimes.
- The 448-page Mueller report contains copious detail about how Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election, both by using social media to influence American voters with misinformation and by hacking into the Clinton campaign’s computers. Russian operatives also connected with WikiLeaks to release the stolen material. Lisa Desjardins and William Brangham share some of the key findings.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/inside-the-mueller-report-a-sophisticated-russian-interference-campaign
I was actually referring to other things when I referred to dishonest approaches, which I talked about in the reply to basballguy.
The situation you bring up is different.
If someone post something they believe to be true and others object...they have the opportunity to challenge it. That's the way it should work. If someone is making a claim, they should have to provide proof. If someone doesn't think the proof is accurate or truthful, they can provide evidence or arguments against the claim.
