08-26-2023, 11:06 AM
(08-26-2023, 10:51 AM)pally Wrote: My stance is to let the sporting federations decide the participation rules for their sports, not the government. They are best equipped to make the decisions that are best for their sports
So, you think it's fine for a business to discriminate against women? Should they be able to decide that for themselves?
(08-26-2023, 11:00 AM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Get outa here with that Science stuff. When science supports their stance, it's all about the science, when it doesn't, it's all about feelings. No one wants to admit it removes the integrity of women's sports.
To be fair, both sides are in the hypocrisy business. Right now the far left is by far the more hypocritical group, in a decade or so it'll probably flip. But their stance on this issue is honestly befuddling. Especially when you consider that in many states, CA for one, all it takes to be a woman is to decide you're one. So an NFL linebacker can decide he's now a woman and go play in a woman's rugby match and beat the absolutely dogshit out of them. Something similar happened of late, and it wasn't the same caliber of male athlete
https://torontosun.com/news/local-news/warmington-female-rugby-players-complain-trans-opponent-hits-too-hard
Guy is "non-binary" (so he's a guy sometimes, right?) and is 5'10" 220 lbs. You know what, pally is right, just deal with it ladies.
