New Mexico governor deliberately violates Constitution

[Dill]

(09-15-2023, 12:00 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I'll leave it at this because I can already see where this is going.  You are conveniently leaving out the "law" from the phrase "law and order"  If I meant just order that's what I would have said.  You can't have "law" and order without an adherence to the law.  Please don't bother parsing hairs it's both pointless and tiring.

I will now kindly leave you to answer Hollo's direct question.

I quite understand you meant "LAW and order." 

And no one is arguing that we can't have "law and order" without law.

If that's your pretext for bailing, so be it. 

You are going on record as disputing any essential distinction between rule of law and law and order,

but you are not going to defend that claim, because you can see where that would go. I can too.