Joe Biden lies exposed.Karine Jean-Pierre last week lies again also.

[Mike M (the other one)]

(09-17-2023, 09:15 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Here is sworn testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee from 2016, a short time after this all occurred and well before there was any scrutiny on the matter. It discusses the international concern with Shokin: https://www.foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/03%2015%2016%20Ukrainian%20Reforms%20Two%20Years%20After%20the%20Maidan%20Revolution%20and%20the%20Russian%20Invasion.pdf

Here is an article from around the same time from the European Council on Foreign Relations which highlights the corruption in the PGO and the role Shokin played in this: https://ecfr.eu/article/commentary_no_reforms_no_aid_for_ukraine_7020/

And here is an article from the Kyiv Post about the firing where it discusses the criticisms of Shokin for at the minimum, being slow to reform and eliminate the corruption in the office: https://www.kyivpost.com/post/10121

The Irish Times talking about the firing being praised by the EU: https://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/europe/eu-hails-sacking-of-ukraine-s-prosecutor-viktor-shokin-1.2591190

Radio Free Europe talking about the IMF calling for Shokin's firing at the time: https://www.rferl.org/a/ukraine-imf-demand-poroshenko-corruption/27545849.html

An article from FT, a pretty down the middle news source, discussing this back in 2019: https://www.ft.com/content/e1454ace-e61b-11e9-9743-db5a370481bc

Everything from contemporary sources seems to corroborate the story that Biden was not acting alone, that Shokin was corrupt, and that his ousting was something being sought by the international community. The memos may raise some eyebrows, but it takes reading them with some confirmation bias to see anything in them like the NY Post is claiming.

I can see he was protecting his own especially if he felt like he was under attack. 
If he was so corrupt, why didn't they pull his bank records and find those mysterious deposits and charge him?
I can't find anywhere in the news where he was found accepting bribes.

None of the links you provided actually said why he was corrupt or gave any proof. And all articles were posted AFTER he went after Burisma owner. Which makes me say hmmmmmmmm.

His Successor though...Artem Sytnik didn't accept the bribe from Burisma's owner.. but the fact that he was offered a 6M bribe 5 years later is fishy to me. I don't think he would have been offered one if they didn't think he would accept. Not very smart to offer a bribe to they guy that's persecuting you.. just another hmmmm


Not saying he's innocent in any way, but something doesn't feel right to me.