P01135809 goes after "Liberal Jews" on Jewish New Year

[Dill]

(09-30-2023, 04:53 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Classic Dill logic.  Incidents in which "farming equipment" was used to provoke an armed response completely cancels out all the other blatant acts of aggression by non-standard forces against Israel.  Where were these forces based out of?  Who was supplying and aiding them?  Nah, that's not important, what is important is that farming equipment is a provocation that literally anyone would be compelled to shoot at.  And that negates absolutely everything else.
Sorry, Dill, your bias is extreme on this issue.  But this isn't new information. 

You didn't get it. 

Dayan was explaining the cause of "blatant aggression" on the Heights--Israeli provocation, especially of the Syrian Army. 

He says he considered that Israel might be forced to return land seized by war, but thought that could be forstalled if enough Kibbutzim settled it
quickly. The goal was to expand Israeli territory by taking Syrian. That would displace Syrian farmers and create more "irregular forces," which he did not consider a serious threat. He didn't even consider the Syrians a threat. Dayan says:

''You don't strike at the enemy because he is a bastard, but because he threatens you. 
And the Syrians, on the fourth day of the war, were not a threat to us.''

"Aggression" by Palestinians seeking to get their homes back was eve more negligible in this context--though it appears to be the primary driver of everything for you.

An Israeli general tells us he provoked attacks on the Golan with an eye to seizing land, and you frame out any recognition of Israeli culpability in the ensuing violence as "extreme bias."  Looks to me like your views on the war and the annexation are impervious both to historical evidence and the law.