10-24-2023, 11:08 PM
(10-24-2023, 05:00 PM)BFritz21 Wrote: Here's the thing. There was NO LACK OF EVIDENCE, unless you ignore common sense.
There was some of that, sure. But it was pretty much all testimonial and not the slam dunk evidence of a DNA test or a video of the proceedings. Would it have been enough to convict in a trial? Maybe, maybe not. We’ll never know for sure.
But speaking of evidence, your evasion of my point is evidence that it is valid: You would absolutely defend an accused Bengal player in the absence of a conviction, and you know it.
