10-25-2023, 04:04 PM
(10-24-2023, 11:08 PM)JS-Steelerfan Wrote: There was some of that, sure. But it was pretty much all testimonial and not the slam dunk evidence of a DNA test or a video of the proceedings. Would it have been enough to convict in a trial? Maybe, maybe not. We’ll never know for sure.
But speaking of evidence, your evasion of my point is evidence that it is valid: You would absolutely defend an accused Bengal player in the absence of a conviction, and you know it.
False.
Not in an instant of rape, and not when it's obvious what happened, regardless of whether it can be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.
You have yet to answer why his body guards would have to lead a girl into a bathroom that was willing and why his bodyguards would need to guard the door.
Explain how that's not evidence to anyone with a reasonably functional brain.
However, in terms of legality, it does cast a shadow of a doubt, but not in terms of common sense.