10-26-2023, 12:10 PM
(10-26-2023, 11:30 AM)Goalpost Wrote: It's reported his condition of mental health included hearing voices. That's not good.
(10-26-2023, 11:48 AM)Nately120 Wrote: This makes sense, but I'm also sure a lot of people will refuse to trust the fairness and legitimacy of any process by which the government is allowed to seize a citizens firearms and prevent that person from legally owning them.
(10-26-2023, 11:59 AM)HarleyDog Wrote: Simply because they would go too far. Background checks and mental health checks are ok with limits. You simply cannot tell someone who has ever battled with depression they cannot own a firearm or even someone who has been arrested for a non-violent crime. You would be banning firearms from most of the country. There are stricter laws preventing someone from holding a TWIC card than a firearm. So yes, more restrictions should be in place within reason. The problem is, that the government has no clue what "within reason" means.
"Shall not be infringed!"
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
