10-30-2023, 12:32 PM
(10-30-2023, 12:17 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Sure he didn't. I'll let him tell you himself. He did say he won't use troops to go door to door, so yeah, hang your hat on that.
So mandatory confiscation followed by severe criminal prosecution if you refuse to comply. How are you going to confiscate the weapons that aren't turned in? Thoughts and prayers? He literally says it himself. So yeah, it's just as stupid as the person you quoted. Not to mention blatantly unconstitutional. Instead of trying to defend the fascist (appropriately used here) lawmaker, maybe agree that his position is awful? Unless you agree with him. Do you think there should be confiscation followed by sever criminal prosecution for those who refuse to comply?
I couldn't care less what you do or don't do.
The answer to your question was in his response I quoted. If caught, as with anything banned like drugs, that would be confiscated and the person punished by the law. It explained it clearly and concisely. So I don't have to defend him.
While it also addresses the problem better than saying it is caused by "feminism" and abortion I'll add I don't think his idea would work and would likely never come close to passing as a law...so I wasn't defending him. I clarified that what you said was wrong.
I know you want to push a false narrative to create the illusion or fascism and the fear that comes with it when it comes to guns but this was a very poor attempt.
