12-29-2015, 07:38 PM
(12-29-2015, 07:26 PM)Stonyhands Wrote: I think a big problem with Hill is the way Hue draws up his blocking scheme. Hill is usually a one cut then uphill runner. Problem is that Hue pulls all his backside blockers and the defenders key this and everything gets jammed up where we are trying to run. The backside defenders always go unblocked and while Hill is waiting for a hole to open he gets tackled from the unblocked defenders for a loss way too often.
If you recall, Hue didn't really do that until Pittsburgh smoked us with it last year. After that, Hue added it to our playbook and had some success.
Quote:Hue is a terrible OC. The amount of talent we have and he runs so many gimmicky plays when we should be able to line up our 11 and beat the 11 in front of us. With a healthy Eifert, Jones, Sanu, and Green we see games where some of these guys don't even get targeted at all for large periods of time. We've thrown away how many downs on passes to our backup tackle for Pete sake. How many times is he going to telegraph a throw to Gio?
I agree that he gets too cute at times, but to say he is a terrible OC just isn't true. Hue's a good OC who gets caught up in the moment more than I'd like... If he was a terrible OC, we wouldn't have owned the first half of this game the way we did.
Quote:As much as they were committing to the run and pass rush, how many true RB screens did we throw? Why didn't we run the misdirection TE screen?
Hue is terrible at making adjustments. That guy just keeps calling the same damn plays over and over expecting different results as if it's one players missed assignments. No Hue its not ***** working quit calling it!
I don't think that was the case. I think he blew the first series of the second half by waiting to see what adjustments the Broncos were going to make. After that, it felt like he kept the reigns on AJM a bit too long. That really messed us up. When AJM finally had the chance to go deep, I think he left some easy first downs on the field with some deep incompletions... Ah well.
