12-15-2023, 03:32 PM
(12-14-2023, 11:21 PM)Essex Johnson Wrote: I dont really get it, does it matter that a TE is a leading WR in a game over a WR..you are not going to normally shut down all players, so Hockenson as a solid game so what if the rest of core does not do that much... think about it lets say this weekend Tee goes for 125 and a TD , solid game, yet rest of WR/Te go for 150 and 0 or 1 tds.. ive seen that in games when TE had a strong game against us but rest did not.. KC comes to mind
As long as they aren't scoring TD's it is okay. Kittle went off for like 148 yards on us but what mattered in the end was he
didn't get in the endzone. It would be nice though to see us have some success slowing down TE's though yardage wise as
well. Maybe Ivey is the answer, I don't know.
I think as long as JJ and Hockenson are not getting into the endzone we should be fine in this one.
(12-15-2023, 02:19 AM)pally Wrote: So last week the Raiders managed to score exactly zero points against the Vikings defense. Thursday night they put up 63 against the Chargers. Is Minnesota’s defense that good or the Chargers that bad?
That is the question. I think the Chargers are just that bad though and they wanted rid of Staley. That guy was a terrible HC IMO.
(12-15-2023, 02:32 PM)Awful Llama Wrote: A little from column A and a little from column B, I would imagine. Maybe 60/40 Chargers' suckiness?
Edit: I see now where Staley just got the axe. He's lucky they didn't escort him out at halftime last night.
Good to know on Staley, I am not a Chargers fan or anything but I sure wouldn't be happy with him if I was.
So many talented players and that team couldn't do squat when it mattered under that guy.
