Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Passing scheme is average at best.
#10
(01-04-2024, 02:55 PM)Millhouse Wrote: So this basically helps reinforce my armchair eye tests of many a games where it just seems almost every pass seemed to be contested. I know I'm not the only one that has noticed this either, especially when we see opposing receivers more open on our own defense (maybe not saying much).

What are some things that they should try to do more of? More motion pre-snap, more under-center, a better run-game, and/or all the mentioned? Imo it really shouldn't be too complicated as there are some basic strategies that should always be in use such as disguise and surprise while attacking the defense's weakness's while protecting their own. Going out there with a stubborn mindset ignoring those things just reduces chances for a Super Bowl win.

They were doing a lot of this with Burrow. They did a lot of motion, some under center (when he was healthy). 

It's really hard to tell with Browning because we don't know if they are running stuff dumbed down because of him. For example, they ran dagger concept on pretty much every 3rd and long against the Chiefs. It got to the point where the Chiefs were literally sitting on routes because they knew what was coming. 

Why did we continue to call dagger concept? Was it because our coaches suck? Is it because they know Browning is limited in what he can do? 

I used to think it was the latter, but Im just not so sure that our offensive playcalling and schemes don't entirely suck. 
[Image: Screenshot-2022-02-02-154836.png]
The boys are just talkin' ball, babyyyy
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Passing scheme is average at best. - WeezyBengal - 01-04-2024, 03:24 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)