Should Wilkins be #1 FA target if not tagged?

[*bfine32*]

(01-17-2024, 08:27 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I can't tell if you're trying to being serious and just misread my post wrong or if you're intentionally misreading my post and just trying to troll. 

Literally the standard, as in every single player has the exact same standard applied to them on what age season they are. So you don't have to deal with "basically xx age seasons". One standard for all >2000 players on what age season it is for them with no bias involved. So it's not using "age 29 season" as a way to make someone seem like they have more wear and tear, as you alleged. It's just using the exact same standard that has been placed on all players to report the number.

If age is "The Standard" Then why isn't it used to:

Deterime Vested players

Decide FA status

The duration contracts are signed for



I've literally never heard anyone in media, message boards. ect... saying "He's entering his age 29 Year".

I have heard he's entering his 5th-6th season AND will be X-old during that year.

IMO it's not that big of a deal, but nothing "official" is based on age.

Hell you have to be x-years out of HS to get drafted, not a certain age.