Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why should we agree to reward sanctuary cities in latest Schumer/Biden senate bill?
#31
(02-06-2024, 02:21 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: Title 42 being in place meant this wasn't needed, plus when Trump tried something similar the courts shot it down. This policy is still in jeopardy in the courts, but essentially when the Title 42 restrictions ended, this took effect. That was the reasoning for the timing.

And two years, BTW. Hehe

The courts shutting it down is far less of an issue when you have a SCOTUS very likely to be favorably inclined to not only stay the initial order but fast track hearing the matter.  Two years is still quite a long time btw.  Interesting that a federal court would strike down a move so clearly rooted in the law.

Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Why should we agree to reward sanctuary cities in latest Schumer/Biden senate bill? - Sociopathicsteelerfan - 02-06-2024, 02:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)