A good perspective of giving Tee the big money extention

[Whatever]

(02-11-2024, 06:22 PM)Housh Wrote: You are NEVER gonna pay Tee 25M per and be mad that you did it, outside of him being injured.


Think about it.

If we have Tee the next 3-7 years and he never got injured you would probably view 25M per as a DISCOUNT.


The ONLY reason you'd be against paying Tee is his availability.


When he plays hes a #1. Every game Jamarr Chase is injured, Tee turns into a MONSTER.



Im sorry but I want that monster on the team. If its a bad deal in 3 years so be it. Itll look like a great deal when its 17-24 the bad guys, and Tee catches a jumpball over 2 people and ties it up.

Why would I pay $25 mil per year to a WR2?

Furthermore, it's hard to find a position group where the Bengals have a better hit rate on than WR.  $25 mil for a guy that you can reasonably expect to replace for 4-5 years with a 1st or 2nd round pick doesn't make a lot of sense.  

While your example sounds great, why is Tee catching a jump ball over two guys?  Because he couldn't get open, that's why.