A good perspective of giving Tee the big money extention

[Essex Johnson]

(02-11-2024, 06:22 PM)Housh Wrote: You are NEVER gonna pay Tee 25M per and be mad that you did it, outside of him being injured.


Think about it.

If we have Tee the next 3-7 years and he never got injured you would probably view 25M per as a DISCOUNT.


The ONLY reason you'd be against paying Tee is his availability.


When he plays hes a #1. Every game Jamarr Chase is injured, Tee turns into a MONSTER.



Im sorry but I want that monster on the team. If its a bad deal in 3 years so be it. Itll look like a great deal when its 17-24 the bad guys, and Tee catches a jumpball over 2 people and ties it up.

Here is the positive about not signing Tee, quality college WRs are now becoming more and more abundant in draft espeically #2 type Wrs which Tee is on this team, what is hard to replace or draft are Oline and DTs, that is where we need to spend money on over next couple years. I agree Tee showed up well with Chase out but if you base it on games per year, you are talking about less than 2 games a year average ( 5 total games), plus the amount of snaps Higgins has been out , it just does not warrant paying a #2 that much money.