More Supporting Evidence

[Dill]

(02-22-2024, 01:57 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Please show us how this was the same as the Steele Dossier in volume. Please also show us once Steele's info was debunked and proven paid for by Hillary Clinton, the F.B.I. arrested Steele and charged him. Oh wait, Steele was never arrested, he was a Democratic operative so he got a free pass.

Compiling opposition research is no crime, even if PARTIALLY paid for by the Clinton campaign.

So why would the FBI arrest a British citizen living in England who had broken no US laws?

The answer is clear--the FBI was weaponized against Trump!

I think Bels was not equating the content of the "debunked" 1023 document to the Steele Dossier, which was neither a "lie" nor debunked.

Rather the term of comparison was "fiasco"--the eagerness to create a false narrative around each for political ends, which ended badly in each case.

Though may that explanation doesn't make sense to some who still hold to the false narrative.