More Supporting Evidence

[JustWinBaby]

(02-23-2024, 07:35 PM)Dill Wrote: Compiling opposition research is no crime, even if PARTIALLY paid for by the Clinton campaign.

So why would the FBI arrest a British citizen living in England who had broken no US laws?

The answer is clear--the FBI was weaponized against Trump!

I think Bels was not equating the content of the "debunked" 1023 document to the Steele Dossier, which was neither a "lie" nor debunked.

Rather the term of comparison was "fiasco"--the eagerness to create a false narrative around each for political ends, which ended badly in each case.

Though may that explanation doesn't make sense to some who still hold to the false narrative.

So Hillary launders disinformation from Russian agents....resulting in a bogus 2.5+ year investigation of Trump.  Another guy does the same, this time to Biden, and instead of investigating Biden they charge the informant with a crime?  

I'm not following your attempt to make a distinction with a difference, other than the obvious.

But, hey, that pee tape was neither a "lie" nor debunked, there was just no evidence.  TOTALLY different!