03-01-2024, 02:29 AM
(03-01-2024, 12:54 AM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Interesting doesn't seem like it prevents IVF.. Just prevents Octo-moms by not allowing as many eggs to be implanted as before.
I also believe that frozen Eggs/Sperm should be protected. Some people use this as a method for saving their eggs/sperm in the event that something happens and they can no longer produce naturally and desire a child at a later time in their lives. The companies involved are paid to protect those assets, if someone willingly destroys them, then yes they should be charged with something.
Maybe i'm not as current on this example, but didn't the person that got charged willingly destroyed someone else's eggs?
The case is over which statute applies. I would suspect a shear negligence case pays out differently than harm to an unborn child does.
There are now rules in place guiding how many embryos can be implanted at any one time. While a doctor can’t go to jail he can be sued for malpractice if he implants more than 2 at a time.
The problem is what happens to stored embryos that don’t get used. Right now the parent(s) can have them destroyed. But Alabama just nixed that. So they get stored until the end of time? Storing embryos isn’t free which is why parents don’t want to keep them forever
Fueled by the pursuit of greatness.
