03-03-2024, 07:51 PM
(03-02-2024, 08:05 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Also interesting that you believe terrorists over an ally, but to do otherwise would be to go against your buddy, which you've literally never done.
This embrace of pre-judgment as a standard is rather MORE interesting.
I'm wondering if it fits with the odd imputation that not going "against [a] buddy" would
somehow be an important consideration for Dino, rather than his own, long-held ethical standards.
It's like the facts of the case are of little interest and you are busy imagining/constructing
motivations/connections you cannot possible know to fill in the vacuum.