Thread Rating:
  • 5 Vote(s) - 1.8 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New Witness emerges against Willis and Wade
#26
(03-07-2024, 01:39 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: Why is it not credible? Why would she put herself at risk of perjury assuming if she testifies, she will be placed under oath?

For the record, Bradley changed his testimony from texting Trump's attorney. He said in the text Wade absolutely was in a relationship with Willis prior to November 2021. He also texted the attorney Wade took trips with Willis. 

Bradley then changed his tune on the stand from absolutely to I was speculating. He became elusive and would not answer questions. 

So no Pally, Bradley did not give expected testimony. He attempted to avoid it by claiming attorney client privilege. Then he changed it.

Bradley testified on Wednesday, final arguments were on Friday so in essence she had 1 day to make a decision on if she should testify, that is assuming she watched or read about his testimony immediately.


I find it strange you feel a woman should have 5+ months to make a decision on abortion yet attempt to discredit a woman for taking 1 day to 0make decision that could impact her career. Cobb county is a Democratic County, testifying against Bradley hurting Willis could kill her career.
 
The Cobb County Assistant DA took an oath to uphold the law.  She chose to delay reporting potential exculpatory evidence for whatever reason.  Unfortunately, that delay leads to a concern about her credibility.  Cobb County, btw, is more purple than blue or red.  It went blue in the last Presidential election but the overall governance of the county is mixed.

Bradley did not change his testimony.  He TESTFIED that those texts were speculative.  He told her not to call him to testify.  He fought the subpoena.  The problem is she didn't vet his actual testimony.  So his testimony is essentially that he lied in the texts.  Her job was to disprove that BEFORE SHE CLOSED THE CASE.

We can't lose sight of the forest for the trees. The issue remains that she had to somehow "prove" that Willis and Wade conducted themselves in such a manner that it would be impossible for the defendants to get a fair trial.  Based on the evidence produced in the hearing, they failed to do that but we shall see what the judge says
 

 Fueled by the pursuit of greatness.
 




Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: New Witness emerges against Willis and Wade - pally - 03-07-2024, 03:45 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)