Israel/Hamas War Superthread

[Dill]

(03-08-2024, 12:33 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: The underlined is the issue with you, and always has been.  You directly equate the terrorist dogs in Hamas to Israelis, whether in government or the IDF.  There is no comparison.  Hamas are religious fanatics who wantonly rape and murder civilians while kidnapping literal babies and toddlers.  They are the lowest scum the human race has ever produced.  Your attempts to equate them to any body of people in Israel is the worst kind of equivocating.  There is no comparable actor in Israel, not even close.  To find a comparable actor you need to confine yourself to the other Islamic fascists in ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, as well as the terrorist regime in Iran.

Your consistent, and persistent, attempts to draw parallels between Hamas and the IDF or Israeli government is pure terrorist whitewashing and propaganda.  You are the Bagdad Bob of Hamas and I'm damn sure not going to let you spew that drivel unchallenged.  Thankfully, your very persistence is now working against you as others are starting to notice about you what I've known for years.

Well, that's why I think we need to discuss the nature of "denunciation" first. 

You argue that

1. any discovery/exposure of IDF violations of IHL (including via occupation) equates them with Hamas. So, to protect Israel,

2. no one should be allowed to discover/acknowledge/discuss IDF violations of IHL--"parallels"--in principle. 

Application of that double standard would censor/block fact-based discussion on ideological grounds, so I won't cooperate.

You don't have the power to actually censor/block discussion, so the threat of denunciation ("Baghdad Dill supports the enemy!") 
remains your only means of deterring full discussion of accurate reporting on current and past events. 

Why do you always claim to know that unnamed "others" agree with you? I'd bet a week's salary I could name nine forum members 
(not including Dino) who won't agree that criticizing IDF conduct/Israeli politics = "supporting Hamas," but they would agree
that your threat of denunciation negatively affects open discussion.  People who follow your lead will come from a different
subset of posters, from whom you (ironically) frequently seek to distance yourself. 

So for now, dodging the factual record, and failing to appreciate both the history of the conflict and international law, 
mean your "challenges" to my drivel can't move beyond name calling, and will continue to be ineffective.