03-11-2024, 06:39 PM
(03-11-2024, 06:34 PM)Lucius Cincinnatus Wrote: There is typically more interception variance year to year than sacks. 2022 INT leaders & their 2023 INTs
Justin Simmons: 6 (2022) 3 (2023)
Minkah Fitzpatrick: 6 (2022) 0 (2023)
CJ Garnder Johnson: 6 (2022) 1 (2023)
Riq Woolen: 6 (2022) 2 (2023)
Patrick Peterson: 5 (2022) 2 (2023)
Harrison Smith: 5 (2022) 0 (2023)
Tashaun Gipson: 5 (2022) 1 (2023)
Jaire Alexandrer: 5 (2022) 0 (2023)
Only 1 player had even 50% of their INT from the previous year.
Not sure the point here. I was pointing out that Hendrickson was a relatively unproven player when we signed him as he mentioned Scott was and this feels like Scott. I actually mentioned INTs in another thread are a bit of a random thing in analytics. Hendrickson didn't even have big sack numbers when we signed him, it was built around pressures which do interestingly have a better track record of predicting future success. It's actually Stones coverage ability as a whole that should get people excited rather than the INTS.
